Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 35-43.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5061
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhong-hua SHENG1, Zi-liang ZHU2, Ning MA1, Wei LI2, Ji-wai HE1, Xiang-jin WEI1, Gao-neng SHAO1, Jian-long WANG2, Pei-song HU1, Shao-qing TANG1,*()
Received:
2015-04-08
Revised:
2015-07-20
Online:
2016-01-10
Published:
2016-01-10
Contact:
Shao-qing TANG
About author:
# These authors contributed equally to this work;
圣忠华1, 朱子亮2, 马宁1, 李威2, 贺记外1, 魏祥进1, 邵高能1, 王建龙2, 胡培松1, 唐绍清1,*()
通讯作者:
唐绍清
作者简介:
# 共同第一作者;
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Zhong-hua SHENG, Zi-liang ZHU, Ning MA, Wei LI, Ji-wai HE, Xiang-jin WEI, Gao-neng SHAO, Jian-long WANG, Pei-song HU, Shao-qing TANG. QTL Mapping of Yield Related Traits in Super Rice Variety Zhongjiazao 17[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 35-43.
圣忠华, 朱子亮, 马宁, 李威, 贺记外, 魏祥进, 邵高能, 王建龙, 胡培松, 唐绍清. 超级稻品种中嘉早17产量相关性状QTL定位研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(1): 35-43.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5061
性状与世代 Trait and generation | F2 / F2:3分离群体 Segregation populations | 亲本 Parent | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
变幅 Variation | 峰值 Peak | 偏值 Partial | D50 | 中嘉早17 Zhongjiazao 17 | ||||
株高 PH/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 67.13~123.00 | 92.52±0.66 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 90.50 | 77.71 | ||
F2:3 | 71.76~130.70 | 101.92±0.71 | 0.37 | -0.26 | 91.20 | 79.30 | ||
剑叶长 LFL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 20.14~53.89 | 34.04±0.34 | 0.83 | 0.30 | 31.40 | 30.80 | ||
F2:3 | 19.10~44.54 | 31.76±0.32 | -0.10 | 0.16 | 33.10 | 30.30 | ||
剑叶宽 WFL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 1.06~2.23 | 1.65±0.01 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 1.31 | 1.79 | ||
F2:3 | 1.18~3.77 | 1.66±0.02 | 2.26 | 3.52 | 1.35 | 1.81 | ||
有效穗数 NTPP | ||||||||
F2 | 5.50~36.00 | 14.12±0.35 | 1.98 | 1.05 | 13.60 | 15.10 | ||
F2:3 | 4.38~12.00 | 7.62±0.10 | -0.13 | 0.52 | 12.80 | 15.60 | ||
穗长 PL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 18.56~33.25 | 25.54±0.17 | 0.52 | -0.17 | 26.86 | 20.74 | ||
F2:3 | 17.21~26.44 | 22.00±0.11 | 0.10 | -0.30 | 27.10 | 19.80 | ||
单株总粒数 NFGP | ||||||||
F2 | 897.00~4295.00 | 1654.35±33.24 | 5.28 | 1.69 | 2188.43 | 1586.63 | ||
F2:3 | 594.88~1747.88 | 1076.50±15.30 | -0.01 | 0.52 | 1785.30 | 1521.36 | ||
结实率 SSR | ||||||||
F2 | 0.09~0.88 | 0.57±0.01 | 1.24 | -0.56 | 62.29 | 71.30 | ||
F2:3 | 0.20~0.87 | 0.63±0.01 | 1.14 | -0.64 | 65.30 | 78.10 | ||
千粒重 TGW/g | ||||||||
F2 | 15.17~29.00 | 22.97±0.15 | 0.44 | 0.06 | 22.00 | 25.60 | ||
F2:3 | 18.25~33.25 | 27.09±0.17 | 0.23 | -0.17 | 22.50 | 26.20 |
Table 1 Agronomic traits performances of F2 and F2:3 populations of Zhongjiazao 17 × D50.
性状与世代 Trait and generation | F2 / F2:3分离群体 Segregation populations | 亲本 Parent | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
变幅 Variation | 峰值 Peak | 偏值 Partial | D50 | 中嘉早17 Zhongjiazao 17 | ||||
株高 PH/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 67.13~123.00 | 92.52±0.66 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 90.50 | 77.71 | ||
F2:3 | 71.76~130.70 | 101.92±0.71 | 0.37 | -0.26 | 91.20 | 79.30 | ||
剑叶长 LFL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 20.14~53.89 | 34.04±0.34 | 0.83 | 0.30 | 31.40 | 30.80 | ||
F2:3 | 19.10~44.54 | 31.76±0.32 | -0.10 | 0.16 | 33.10 | 30.30 | ||
剑叶宽 WFL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 1.06~2.23 | 1.65±0.01 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 1.31 | 1.79 | ||
F2:3 | 1.18~3.77 | 1.66±0.02 | 2.26 | 3.52 | 1.35 | 1.81 | ||
有效穗数 NTPP | ||||||||
F2 | 5.50~36.00 | 14.12±0.35 | 1.98 | 1.05 | 13.60 | 15.10 | ||
F2:3 | 4.38~12.00 | 7.62±0.10 | -0.13 | 0.52 | 12.80 | 15.60 | ||
穗长 PL/cm | ||||||||
F2 | 18.56~33.25 | 25.54±0.17 | 0.52 | -0.17 | 26.86 | 20.74 | ||
F2:3 | 17.21~26.44 | 22.00±0.11 | 0.10 | -0.30 | 27.10 | 19.80 | ||
单株总粒数 NFGP | ||||||||
F2 | 897.00~4295.00 | 1654.35±33.24 | 5.28 | 1.69 | 2188.43 | 1586.63 | ||
F2:3 | 594.88~1747.88 | 1076.50±15.30 | -0.01 | 0.52 | 1785.30 | 1521.36 | ||
结实率 SSR | ||||||||
F2 | 0.09~0.88 | 0.57±0.01 | 1.24 | -0.56 | 62.29 | 71.30 | ||
F2:3 | 0.20~0.87 | 0.63±0.01 | 1.14 | -0.64 | 65.30 | 78.10 | ||
千粒重 TGW/g | ||||||||
F2 | 15.17~29.00 | 22.97±0.15 | 0.44 | 0.06 | 22.00 | 25.60 | ||
F2:3 | 18.25~33.25 | 27.09±0.17 | 0.23 | -0.17 | 22.50 | 26.20 |
性状Trait (F2) | 株高 PH | 剑叶长 LFL | 剑叶宽 WFL | 有效穗数 NTPP | 穗长 PL | 单株总粒数 NFGP | 结实率 SSR | 千粒重 TGW | 性状Trait (F2:3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高PH | 0.322** | 0.242** | 0.004 | 0.066 | -0.009 | -0.008 | 0.080 | 株高PH | |
剑叶长LFL | 0.323** | 0.211** | -0.009 | 0.049 | 0.003 | -0.035 | -0.038 | 剑叶长LFL | |
剑叶宽WFL | 0.407** | 0.271** | -0.066 | 0.070 | 0.023 | -0.119* | 0.036 | 剑叶宽WFL | |
有效穗数NTPP | -0.099 | -0.014 | -0.107 | -0.184** | 0.671** | -0.002 | 0.111 | 有效穗数NTPP | |
穗长PL | 0.268** | 0.153** | 0.087 | -0.158** | 0.205** | -0.151** | -0.073 | 穗长PL | |
单株总粒数NFGP | -0.010 | 0.003 | -0.152** | 0.312** | 0.123* | -0.119* | -0.013 | 单株总粒数NFGP | |
结实率SSR | 0.014 | 0.026 | -0.022 | -0.213** | 0.050 | -0.260** | 0.118* | 结实率SSR | |
千粒重TGW | 0.084 | -0.077 | 0.081 | -0.136* | -0.008 | -0.055 | -0.070 | 千粒重TGW |
Table 2 Correlation coefficients among agronomic traits in F2 and F2:3 populations of Zhongjiazao 17 × D50.
性状Trait (F2) | 株高 PH | 剑叶长 LFL | 剑叶宽 WFL | 有效穗数 NTPP | 穗长 PL | 单株总粒数 NFGP | 结实率 SSR | 千粒重 TGW | 性状Trait (F2:3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高PH | 0.322** | 0.242** | 0.004 | 0.066 | -0.009 | -0.008 | 0.080 | 株高PH | |
剑叶长LFL | 0.323** | 0.211** | -0.009 | 0.049 | 0.003 | -0.035 | -0.038 | 剑叶长LFL | |
剑叶宽WFL | 0.407** | 0.271** | -0.066 | 0.070 | 0.023 | -0.119* | 0.036 | 剑叶宽WFL | |
有效穗数NTPP | -0.099 | -0.014 | -0.107 | -0.184** | 0.671** | -0.002 | 0.111 | 有效穗数NTPP | |
穗长PL | 0.268** | 0.153** | 0.087 | -0.158** | 0.205** | -0.151** | -0.073 | 穗长PL | |
单株总粒数NFGP | -0.010 | 0.003 | -0.152** | 0.312** | 0.123* | -0.119* | -0.013 | 单株总粒数NFGP | |
结实率SSR | 0.014 | 0.026 | -0.022 | -0.213** | 0.050 | -0.260** | 0.118* | 结实率SSR | |
千粒重TGW | 0.084 | -0.077 | 0.081 | -0.136* | -0.008 | -0.055 | -0.070 | 千粒重TGW |
性状 Trait | QTL | 染色体 Chromosome | 标记区间 Mapping interval | LOD值 LOD value | 加性效应 Additive effect | 贡献率 Contribute rate/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F2 | F2:3 | F2 | F2:3 | F2 | F2:3 | ||||||
株高PH | qPH-1 | 1 | RM3148-RM3746 | 4.18 | 2.76 | -4.96 | -3.02 | 11.68 | 4.25 | ||
qPH-3-1 | 3 | RM7576-RM14898 | 3.86 | -4.77 | 9.63 | ||||||
qPH-3-2 | 3 | RM1373-RM7389 | 12.22 | 6.97 | 5.62 | 4.33 | 14.62 | 7.87 | |||
qPH-4-1 | 4 | RM6659-RM16759 | 2.60 | -2.72 | 3.51 | ||||||
qPH-4-2 | 4 | RM16759-RM16852 | 2.59 | -2.54 | 3.07 | ||||||
qPH-5 | 5 | RM163-RM3170 | 2.75 | 3.25 | -2.37 | -1.97 | 2.73 | 1.76 | |||
qPH-6 | 6 | RM162-RM5463 | 3.44 | 6.23 | -3.70 | -5.65 | 7.39 | 15.34 | |||
qPH-7 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 5.79 | 2.67 | 2.85 | 2.41 | 4.28 | 2.97 | |||
qPH-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 3.86 | 4.42 | 4.36 | 4.91 | 9.46 | 11.37 | |||
qPH-12 | 12 | RM28607-RM1227 | 2.76 | -3.28 | 4.99 | ||||||
剑叶长LFL | qFLL-1 | 1 | RM3746-RM8071 | 4.59 | -2.36 | 12.08 | |||||
qFLL-2 | 2 | RM6-RM6307 | 4.77 | 6.63 | -1.87 | -2.26 | 6.63 | 11.01 | |||
qFLL-3 | 3 | RM3329-RM7389 | 3.56 | 0.29 | 0.18 | ||||||
qFLL-4 | 4 | RM17377-RM17626 | 3.59 | 1.50 | 4.93 | ||||||
qFLL-5-1 | 5 | RM163-RM3790 | 4.71 | -1.12 | 1.65 | ||||||
qFLL-5-2 | 5 | RM3790-RM5907 | 3.24 | 1.99 | 7.09 | ||||||
qFLL-7-1 | 7 | RM11-RM234 | 5.99 | 1.95 | 8.31 | ||||||
qFLL-7-2 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 3.25 | 2.61 | 1.76 | 1.06 | 6.27 | 2.26 | |||
qFLL-10 | 10 | RM1375-RM3451 | 2.52 | -1.53 | 5.03 | ||||||
qFLL-11 | 11 | RM286-RM332 | 2.52 | 1.24 | 3.40 | ||||||
qFLL-12-1 | 12 | RM3747-RM247 | 2.66 | 0.86 | 1.78 | ||||||
qFLL-12-2 | 12 | RM247-RM519 | 3.10 | 0.65 | 1.04 | ||||||
剑叶宽WFL | qFLW-1-1 | 1 | RM1329-RM1344 | 3.08 | -0.09 | 10.31 | |||||
qFLW-1-2 | 1 | RM1344-RM8071 | 4.30 | -0.10 | 14.10 | ||||||
qFLW-1-3 | 1 | RM212-RM3520 | 3.69 | -0.09 | 11.08 | ||||||
qFLW-3 | 3 | RM3199-RM3684 | 2.50 | -0.07 | 5.90 | ||||||
qFLW-4 | 4 | RM17377-RM17626 | 8.10 | 4.76 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 14.37 | 9.04 | |||
qFLW-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 5.85 | 0.20 | 20.45 | ||||||
qFLW-11 | 11 | RM202-RM26652 | 2.84 | 0.02 | 0.90 | ||||||
qFLW-12 | 12 | RM519-RM28546 | 2.65 | 0.02 | 0.48 | ||||||
有效穗数NTPP | qETP-1-1 | 1 | RM1329-RM3746 | 3.64 | 0.56 | 5.44 | |||||
qETP-1-2 | 1 | RM3746-RM1344 | 4.38 | 0.85 | 9.72 | ||||||
qETP-1-3 | 1 | RM8071-RM493 | 2.81 | -0.10 | 0.16 | ||||||
qETP-6 | 6 | RM20522-RM5463 | 3.15 | 2.37 | 9.41 | ||||||
qETP-7 | 7 | RM234-RM118 | 3.05 | 2.55 | 8.15 | ||||||
qETP-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 2.98 | -1.72 | 5.48 | ||||||
穗长PL | qPL-1-1 | 1 | RM3148-RM1329 | 4.89 | -0.51 | 4.45 | |||||
qPL-1-2 | 1 | RM212-RM3520 | 3.88 | 0.61 | 7.08 | ||||||
qPL-2 | 2 | RM6307-RM7337 | 6.51 | -1.50 | 17.60 | ||||||
qPL-3-1 | 3 | RM7576-RM14898 | 2.97 | -0.77 | 9.32 | ||||||
qPL-3-2 | 3 | RM6929-RM6914 | 3.07 | -0.35 | 1.25 | ||||||
qPL-3-3 | 3 | RM3329-RM7389 | 2.54 | 2.77 | 0.21 | 0.83 | 0.34 | 7.48 | |||
qPL-4 | 4 | RM3708-RM17303 | 4.62 | 0.60 | 2.88 | ||||||
qPL-6-1 | 6 | RM20069-RM20155 | 2.50 | -0.64 | 2.96 | ||||||
qPL-6-2 | 6 | RM20155-RM162 | 2.75 | -0.83 | 5.13 | ||||||
qPL-6-3 | 6 | RM3765-RM5463 | 2.81 | -0.62 | 6.73 | ||||||
qPL-7 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 5.45 | 0.53 | 2.32 | ||||||
qPL-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 3.09 | 0.83 | 5.66 | ||||||
单株总粒数NFGP | qNGP-3-1 | 3 | RM5480-RM7197 | 3.28 | -106.49 | 9.90 | |||||
qNGP-3-2 | 3 | RM15012-RM3601 | 3.66 | 91.77 | 7.67 | ||||||
qNGP-6 | 6 | RM3183-RM20069 | 3.10 | -96.60 | 8.69 | ||||||
qNGP-7 | 7 | RM234-RM118 | 2.71 | 238.25 | 7.97 | ||||||
qNGP-12 | 12 | RM1300-RM1227 | 2.53 | -59.34 | 3.31 | ||||||
结实率 SSR | qSSR-1 | 1 | RM8068-RM3746 | 3.98 | 0.04 | 7.01 | |||||
qSSR-3-1 | 3 | RM6914-RM15490 | 2.92 | -0.05 | 8.41 | ||||||
qSSR-3-2 | 3 | RM3199-RM3684 | 3.17 | -0.05 | 7.92 | ||||||
qSSR-4 | 4 | RM3708-RM3839 | 3.01 | 0.02 | 1.65 | ||||||
qSSR-5 | 5 | RM6841-RM3170 | 4.97 | -0.06 | 12.42 | ||||||
qSSR-6 | 6 | RM20522-RM5463 | 3.01 | -0.06 | 9.37 | ||||||
qSSR-8 | 8 | RM22529-RM23174 | 2.94 | -0.04 | 6.31 | ||||||
qSSR-11 | 11 | RM26062-RM26343 | 3.54 | -0.06 | 13.25 | ||||||
千粒重 TGW | qTGW-2 | 2 | RM12495-RM341 | 7.91 | 2.93 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 14.91 | 9.60 | ||
qTGW-3 | 3 | RM15012-RM15844 | 8.44 | 3.64 | 1.36 | 0.84 | 17.33 | 5.83 | |||
qTGW-6 | 6 | RM3805-RM20155 | 3.63 | 3.61 | 0.83 | 1.18 | 7.07 | 11.33 | |||
qTGW-10 | 10 | RM24952-RM2504 | 3.20 | 0.88 | 7.56 | ||||||
qTGW-12 | 12 | RM519-RM28546 | 2.64 | -0.09 | 0.08 |
Table 3 QTL distributions of yield related traits detected in F2 and F2:3 populations of Zhongjiazao 17 × D50.
性状 Trait | QTL | 染色体 Chromosome | 标记区间 Mapping interval | LOD值 LOD value | 加性效应 Additive effect | 贡献率 Contribute rate/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F2 | F2:3 | F2 | F2:3 | F2 | F2:3 | ||||||
株高PH | qPH-1 | 1 | RM3148-RM3746 | 4.18 | 2.76 | -4.96 | -3.02 | 11.68 | 4.25 | ||
qPH-3-1 | 3 | RM7576-RM14898 | 3.86 | -4.77 | 9.63 | ||||||
qPH-3-2 | 3 | RM1373-RM7389 | 12.22 | 6.97 | 5.62 | 4.33 | 14.62 | 7.87 | |||
qPH-4-1 | 4 | RM6659-RM16759 | 2.60 | -2.72 | 3.51 | ||||||
qPH-4-2 | 4 | RM16759-RM16852 | 2.59 | -2.54 | 3.07 | ||||||
qPH-5 | 5 | RM163-RM3170 | 2.75 | 3.25 | -2.37 | -1.97 | 2.73 | 1.76 | |||
qPH-6 | 6 | RM162-RM5463 | 3.44 | 6.23 | -3.70 | -5.65 | 7.39 | 15.34 | |||
qPH-7 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 5.79 | 2.67 | 2.85 | 2.41 | 4.28 | 2.97 | |||
qPH-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 3.86 | 4.42 | 4.36 | 4.91 | 9.46 | 11.37 | |||
qPH-12 | 12 | RM28607-RM1227 | 2.76 | -3.28 | 4.99 | ||||||
剑叶长LFL | qFLL-1 | 1 | RM3746-RM8071 | 4.59 | -2.36 | 12.08 | |||||
qFLL-2 | 2 | RM6-RM6307 | 4.77 | 6.63 | -1.87 | -2.26 | 6.63 | 11.01 | |||
qFLL-3 | 3 | RM3329-RM7389 | 3.56 | 0.29 | 0.18 | ||||||
qFLL-4 | 4 | RM17377-RM17626 | 3.59 | 1.50 | 4.93 | ||||||
qFLL-5-1 | 5 | RM163-RM3790 | 4.71 | -1.12 | 1.65 | ||||||
qFLL-5-2 | 5 | RM3790-RM5907 | 3.24 | 1.99 | 7.09 | ||||||
qFLL-7-1 | 7 | RM11-RM234 | 5.99 | 1.95 | 8.31 | ||||||
qFLL-7-2 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 3.25 | 2.61 | 1.76 | 1.06 | 6.27 | 2.26 | |||
qFLL-10 | 10 | RM1375-RM3451 | 2.52 | -1.53 | 5.03 | ||||||
qFLL-11 | 11 | RM286-RM332 | 2.52 | 1.24 | 3.40 | ||||||
qFLL-12-1 | 12 | RM3747-RM247 | 2.66 | 0.86 | 1.78 | ||||||
qFLL-12-2 | 12 | RM247-RM519 | 3.10 | 0.65 | 1.04 | ||||||
剑叶宽WFL | qFLW-1-1 | 1 | RM1329-RM1344 | 3.08 | -0.09 | 10.31 | |||||
qFLW-1-2 | 1 | RM1344-RM8071 | 4.30 | -0.10 | 14.10 | ||||||
qFLW-1-3 | 1 | RM212-RM3520 | 3.69 | -0.09 | 11.08 | ||||||
qFLW-3 | 3 | RM3199-RM3684 | 2.50 | -0.07 | 5.90 | ||||||
qFLW-4 | 4 | RM17377-RM17626 | 8.10 | 4.76 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 14.37 | 9.04 | |||
qFLW-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 5.85 | 0.20 | 20.45 | ||||||
qFLW-11 | 11 | RM202-RM26652 | 2.84 | 0.02 | 0.90 | ||||||
qFLW-12 | 12 | RM519-RM28546 | 2.65 | 0.02 | 0.48 | ||||||
有效穗数NTPP | qETP-1-1 | 1 | RM1329-RM3746 | 3.64 | 0.56 | 5.44 | |||||
qETP-1-2 | 1 | RM3746-RM1344 | 4.38 | 0.85 | 9.72 | ||||||
qETP-1-3 | 1 | RM8071-RM493 | 2.81 | -0.10 | 0.16 | ||||||
qETP-6 | 6 | RM20522-RM5463 | 3.15 | 2.37 | 9.41 | ||||||
qETP-7 | 7 | RM234-RM118 | 3.05 | 2.55 | 8.15 | ||||||
qETP-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 2.98 | -1.72 | 5.48 | ||||||
穗长PL | qPL-1-1 | 1 | RM3148-RM1329 | 4.89 | -0.51 | 4.45 | |||||
qPL-1-2 | 1 | RM212-RM3520 | 3.88 | 0.61 | 7.08 | ||||||
qPL-2 | 2 | RM6307-RM7337 | 6.51 | -1.50 | 17.60 | ||||||
qPL-3-1 | 3 | RM7576-RM14898 | 2.97 | -0.77 | 9.32 | ||||||
qPL-3-2 | 3 | RM6929-RM6914 | 3.07 | -0.35 | 1.25 | ||||||
qPL-3-3 | 3 | RM3329-RM7389 | 2.54 | 2.77 | 0.21 | 0.83 | 0.34 | 7.48 | |||
qPL-4 | 4 | RM3708-RM17303 | 4.62 | 0.60 | 2.88 | ||||||
qPL-6-1 | 6 | RM20069-RM20155 | 2.50 | -0.64 | 2.96 | ||||||
qPL-6-2 | 6 | RM20155-RM162 | 2.75 | -0.83 | 5.13 | ||||||
qPL-6-3 | 6 | RM3765-RM5463 | 2.81 | -0.62 | 6.73 | ||||||
qPL-7 | 7 | RM118-RM248 | 5.45 | 0.53 | 2.32 | ||||||
qPL-10 | 10 | RM25366-RM25664 | 3.09 | 0.83 | 5.66 | ||||||
单株总粒数NFGP | qNGP-3-1 | 3 | RM5480-RM7197 | 3.28 | -106.49 | 9.90 | |||||
qNGP-3-2 | 3 | RM15012-RM3601 | 3.66 | 91.77 | 7.67 | ||||||
qNGP-6 | 6 | RM3183-RM20069 | 3.10 | -96.60 | 8.69 | ||||||
qNGP-7 | 7 | RM234-RM118 | 2.71 | 238.25 | 7.97 | ||||||
qNGP-12 | 12 | RM1300-RM1227 | 2.53 | -59.34 | 3.31 | ||||||
结实率 SSR | qSSR-1 | 1 | RM8068-RM3746 | 3.98 | 0.04 | 7.01 | |||||
qSSR-3-1 | 3 | RM6914-RM15490 | 2.92 | -0.05 | 8.41 | ||||||
qSSR-3-2 | 3 | RM3199-RM3684 | 3.17 | -0.05 | 7.92 | ||||||
qSSR-4 | 4 | RM3708-RM3839 | 3.01 | 0.02 | 1.65 | ||||||
qSSR-5 | 5 | RM6841-RM3170 | 4.97 | -0.06 | 12.42 | ||||||
qSSR-6 | 6 | RM20522-RM5463 | 3.01 | -0.06 | 9.37 | ||||||
qSSR-8 | 8 | RM22529-RM23174 | 2.94 | -0.04 | 6.31 | ||||||
qSSR-11 | 11 | RM26062-RM26343 | 3.54 | -0.06 | 13.25 | ||||||
千粒重 TGW | qTGW-2 | 2 | RM12495-RM341 | 7.91 | 2.93 | 1.17 | 1.09 | 14.91 | 9.60 | ||
qTGW-3 | 3 | RM15012-RM15844 | 8.44 | 3.64 | 1.36 | 0.84 | 17.33 | 5.83 | |||
qTGW-6 | 6 | RM3805-RM20155 | 3.63 | 3.61 | 0.83 | 1.18 | 7.07 | 11.33 | |||
qTGW-10 | 10 | RM24952-RM2504 | 3.20 | 0.88 | 7.56 | ||||||
qTGW-12 | 12 | RM519-RM28546 | 2.64 | -0.09 | 0.08 |
Fig. 2. QTLs distribution of yield related traits on chromosomes detected both in F2 and F2:3 populations of Zhongjiazao 17× D50, and some fine mapped or cloned yield related genes in the mapped QTL intervals.
[1] | Normile D.Reinventing rice to feed the world.Science, 2008, 321: 330-333. |
[2] | 程式华. 中国超级稻育种. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010. |
Cheng S H.The Super Rice Breeding of China. Beijing: Science press, 2010: 1. | |
[3] | 李绍波, 杨国华, 章志宏, 等. 水稻产量要素相关性状QTL定位. 武汉大学学报:理学版, 2008, 54(6): 713-718. |
Li S B, Yang G H, Zhang Z H, et al.Mapping of QTL controlling yield component related traits in rice.J Wuhan Univ, 2008, 54(6): 713-718. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 刁林林, 赵宏伟, 王敬国, 等. 水稻重要农艺性状的QTL定位. 东北农业大学学报, 2012, 43(1): 48-54. |
Diao L L, Zhao H W, Wang J G, et al.QTL analysis of important agronomic traits in rice.J Northeast Agric Univ, 2012, 43(1): 48-54. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 许凌, 张亚东, 朱镇, 等. 不同年份水稻产量性状的QTL分析. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22(4): 370-376. |
Xu L, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, et al.Dissection of QTLs in two years for yield component traits in rice (Oryza sativa).Chin J Rice Sci, 2008, 22(4): 370-376. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 占小登, 于萍, 林泽川, 等. 利用大粒籼/小粒粳重组自交系定位水稻生育期及产量相关性状QTL. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(6): 570-580. |
Zhan X D, Yu P, Lin Z C, et al.QTL Mapping of heading date and yield-related traits in rice using a recombination inbred lines (RILs) population derived from BG1/XLJ.Chin J Rice Sci, 2014, 28(6): 570-580. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 王兰, 李智, 郑杏梅, 等. 普通野生稻矮化突变体的株高与分蘖基因的QTL定位及主效基因的遗传分析. 华北农学报, 2014, 29(5): 5-9. |
Wang L, Li Z, Zheng X M, et al.Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with height and tillers of Oryza rufipogon Griff. dwarf mutant and genetic analysis of major quantitative locus.Acta Agric Boreali Sim, 2014, 29(5):5-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 胡兰香, 等. 水稻产量相关数量性状基因研究进展. 江西农业学报, 2014, 26(12): 16-20. |
Chen M L, Xiong H J, Hu L X, et al.Research advances in genes of yield-related quantitative traits in rice.Acta Agric Jiangxi, 2014, 26(12):16-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, et al.Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice.Nat Genet, 2008, 40(6): 761-767. |
[10] | Fan C C, Xing Y Z, Mao H L, et al.GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein.Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112(6): 1164-1171. |
[11] | Mao H L, Sun S Y, Yao J L, et al.Linking differential domain functions of the GS3 protein to natural variation of grain size in rice.Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107(45): 19579-19584. |
[12] | Song X J, Huang W, Shi M, et al.A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase.Nat Genet,2007, 39: 623-630. |
[13] | Orjuela J, Garavito A, Bouniol M, et al.A universal core genetic map for rice.Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 120: 563-572. |
[14] | 罗炬, 邵高能, 魏祥进,等. 一个控制水稻株高QTL qPH3的遗传分析. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(4):417-422. |
Luo J, Shao G N, Wei X J, et al.Genetic analysis of a QTL qPH3 for plant height in rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2012, 26(4): 417-422. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | van Ooijen J W. Join Map 4, software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Wageningen, Netherlands: 2006. |
[16] | Wang S, Basten C J, Zeng Z B.Windows QTL cartographer 2.5 department of statistics. Raleigh, USA: North Carolina State University, 2006. |
[17] | McCouch S R. Gene nomenclature system for rice.Rice, 2008, 1: 72-84. |
[18] | 赵建国, 蒋开锋, 杨莉, 等. 水稻产量相关性状QTL定位. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(4): 344-352. |
Zhao J G, Jiang K F, Yang L, et al.QTL mapping for yield related components in a RIL population of rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27(4): 344-352. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | Liu G F, Yang J, Zhu J.Mapping QTL for biomass yield and its components in rice (Oryza sativa L.).Act Gene Sini, 2006, 33(7): 607-616. |
[20] | Hironori I, Tomoko T, Tomoaki S, et al.A rice semi-dwarf gene, Tan-Ginbozu (D35), encodes the gibberellin biosynthesis enzyme, ent-kaurene oxidase.Plant Mol Biol, 2004, 54: 533-547. |
[21] | Hong Z, Miyako Ueguchi-Tanaka, Shozo F, et al.The rice brassinosteroid-deficient dwarf 2 mutant, defective in the rice homolog of arabidopsis DIMINUTO/DWARF1, is rescued by the endogenously accumulated alternative bioactive brassinosteroid, dolichosterone.Plant Cell, 2005, 17, 2243-2254. |
[22] | Zhang G H, Li S Y, Wang L, et al.LSCHL4 from japonica cultivar, which is allelic to NAL1, increases yield of Indica super rice 93-11.Mol Plant, 2014, 7: 1350-1364. |
[23] | Li Y Y, Tao H J, Zhao X Q, et al.Molecular improvement of grain weight and yield in rice by using GW6 gene.Rice Sci, 2014, 21(3):127-132. |
[24] | 李孝琼, 韦宇高, 国庆, 等. 水稻遗传图谱构建及粒形相关性状的QTL定位. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(7): 1154-1159. |
Li X Q, Wei Y, Gao G Q, et al.Construction of genetic map and mapping quantitative trait loci for grain shape-related traits in rice.J Southern Agric, 2014, 45(7):1154-1159. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 张向阳, 张红宇, 徐培洲, 等. 重穗型水稻穗部性状及剑叶宽的QTL定位. 杂交水稻, 2014, 29(6): 56-61. |
Zhang X Y, Zhang H Y, Xu P Z, et al.QTL mapping of flag leaf width and panicle traits of heavy-panicle rice.Hybrid Rice, 2014, 29(6): 56-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 陈燕华, 黄大辉, 邱永福, 等. 水稻主要农艺性状的QTL 分析. 华南农业大学学报, 2014, 35(5): 42-51. |
Chen Y H, Huang D H, Qui Y F, et al.A QTL analysis of main agronomic characters in rice,Oryza sativa. J South China Agric Univ, 2014, 35(5):42-51. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | Kazumitsu O, Horiuchi Y, Noriko I, et al.A QTL cluster for plant architecture and its ecological significance in Asian wild rice.Breeding Sci, 2007, 57(1): 7-16. |
[28] | Yang J, Hu C, Hu H, et al.QTL Network: Mapping and visualizing genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations.Bioinformatics,2008, 24: 721-723. |
[1] | Jie LI, Rongrong TIAN, Tianliang BAI, Chunyan ZHU, Jiawei SONG, Lei TIAN, Shuaiguo MA, Jiandong LÜ, Hui HU, Zhenyu WANG, Chengke LUO, Yinxia ZHANG, Peifu LI. Comprehensive Evaluation and QTL Analysis for Flag Leaf Traits Using a Backcross Population in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(6): 573-585. |
[2] | Xina CHEN, Zeke YUAN, Zhenzhen HU, Quanzhi ZHAO, Hongzheng SUN. QTL-Seq Mapping of Head Rice Rate QTLs in japonica Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(5): 449-454. |
[3] | Zhijuan JI, Yuxiang ZENG, Yan LIANG, YANGChangdeng. Research and Progress of Bakanae Disease Resistance in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(1): 1-10. |
[4] | Anpeng ZHANG, Qian QIAN, Zhenyu GAO. Research Advances on Rice Seed Vigor [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(3): 296-303. |
[5] | Biaolin HU, Derun HUANG, Yeqing XIAO, Qiangsheng HE, Yong WAN, Yeyang FAN. QTL Analysis for Mineral Contents in Brown Rice Using a BC2F4:5 Population Derived from Dongxiang Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(1): 43-50. |
[6] | Wei LI, Zhonghua SHENG, Ziliang ZHU, Xiangjin WEI, Lei SHI, Yawen WU, Shaoqing TANG, Jianlong WANG, Peisong HU. QTL Mapping of japonica Rice Stigma Exsertion Rate [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(1): 23-30. |
[7] | Xue-qin YANG, Ting-ting CHEN, Xia ZHAO, Cai-xia ZHANG, Yong-jie YANG, Guan-fu FU, Long-xing TAO. Mechanism Behind the Effects of GA3 and PP333 on Grain Yield Formation of Super Rice Yongyou 12 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 53-61. |
[8] | Jin-long GONG, Zhi-peng XING, Ya-jie HU, Hong-cheng ZHANG, Qi-gen DAI, Zhong-yang HUO, Ke XU, Hai-yan WEI, Hui GAO. Difference in Lodging Resistance of Culm Between indica and japonica Super Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(3): 273-281. |
[9] | Jie REN, Xiu-qin ZHAO, Zai-song DING, Chao XIANG, Jing ZHANG, Chao WANG, Jun-wei ZHANG, Augustino JOSEPH Charles, Qiang ZHANG, Yun-long PANG, Yong-ming GAO, Ying-yao SHI. Dissection and QTL Mapping of Low-phosphorus Tolerance Using Selected Introgression Lines in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(1): 1-13. |
[10] | Bao-wei GUO, Da-wei ZHU, Ke XU, Hong-cheng ZHANG, Xing-tao ZHOU, Cong-cong ZHU, Li-qiang CAO, Hou-cun CHEN, Jing-du CHEN, Qi-gen DAI, Zhong-yang HUO, Hai-yan WEI, Ming-yin LI. Effect of Ordered Transplanting and Optimized Broadcasting on the Culm Lodging Resistance of Super Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(1): 45-55. |
[11] | ZHANG Fenyun1,2,3, LI Hong2,3, WANG Chongrong2,3, ZHOU Degui2,3, ZHOU Xiangyang4, SITU Zhimou, LAI Suichun2,3, CHEN Liyun1, ZHOU Shaochuan1,2,3,*. Stability Analysis of Rice Yield Related Traits of Varieties Derived from Huanghuazhan and It Parents [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(5): 487-495. |
[12] | FU Jing1,2, WANG Zhiqin1, YUAN Limin1, WANG Xueming1, YANG Jianchang1,*. Effect of Nitrogen Rates on Grain Yield and Some Physiological Traits of Super Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(4): 391-400. |
[13] | GONG Jinlong, XING Zhipeng, HU Yajie, ZHANG Hongcheng*, DAI Qigen, HUO Zhongyang, XU Ke, WEI Haiyan, GAO Hui. Difference in Growth Duration and Utilization of Temperature and Solar Radiation Between indica and japonica Super Rice in the Lower Yangtze and Huaihe River Valley [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014, 28(3): 267-276. |
[14] | QU Lijun1,2, ZHANG Hongjun2, XIANG Chao2, WANG Hui3, XIA Jiafa3, LI Zefu3, GAO Yongming2,*, SHI Yingyao1,*. Study on the Genetic Basis for Abnormal Heading in Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(6): 559-568. |
[15] | CHEN Peifeng1, DONG Minghui1,2,*, GU Junrong1, HUI Feng3, QIAO Zhongying1, YANG Daifeng1,LIU Tengfei1. Effects of Returning Wheatresidue to Field and Nitrogen Management on Grain Weight and Quality of Superior and Inferior Grains in Super Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2012, 26(6): 715-722. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||